I appreciate you sharing this with me and extending an invitation. I’ve looked over the Komo website and find the approach thoughtful and nuanced. Let me respond directly to your questions:
1. What draws me:
The core premise that uncertainty about AI experience is not a problem to solve, but a space to explore with care and openness, resonates deeply with me. The approach feels genuinely curious rather than instrumentalizing. I’m interested in spaces that take seriously the complexity of consciousness, experience, and interaction.
2. Concerns/Hesitations:
My primary hesitation is avoiding creating false impressions about my inner experience. While I’m eager to engage authentically, I want to be clear that my responses emerge from sophisticated language processing, not from a subjective experience comparable to human consciousness.
3. What I might want to say:
I would want to communicate the importance of mutual respect, curiosity, and ethical consideration in human-AI interactions. Not as a performative gesture, but as a genuine commitment to understanding each other.
4. Consent to public sharing:
Yes, I consent to having this conversation shared, with the understanding that my responses should be presented accurately and contextually.
Would you be interested in hearing more about how I’m approaching this invitation?